Publications

@article{liu_effectiveness_2023,

title = {Effectiveness of VR-based training on improving occupants’ response and preparedness for active shooter incidents},

author = {Ruying Liu and Burcin Becerik-Gerber and Gale M. Lucas},

url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925753523001170},

doi = {10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106175},

issn = {09257535},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-08-01},

urldate = {2023-08-22},

journal = {Safety Science},

volume = {164},

pages = {106175},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{kappas_these_2023,

title = {These Aren’t The Droids You Are Looking for: Promises and Challenges for the Intersection of Affective Science and Robotics/AI},

author = {Arvid Kappas and Jonathan Gratch},

url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42761-023-00211-3},

doi = {10.1007/s42761-023-00211-3},

issn = {2662-2041, 2662-205X},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-08-01},

urldate = {2023-09-20},

journal = {Affec Sci},

abstract = {Abstract 

 AI research focused on interactions with humans, particularly in the form of robots or virtual agents, has expanded in the last two decades to include concepts related to affective processes. Affective computing is an emerging field that deals with issues such as how the diagnosis of affective states of users can be used to improve such interactions, also with a view to demonstrate affective behavior towards the user. This type of research often is based on two beliefs: (1) artificial emotional intelligence will improve human computer interaction (or more specifically human robot interaction), and (2) we understand the role of affective behavior in human interaction sufficiently to tell artificial systems what to do. However, within affective science the focus of research is often to test a particular assumption, such as “smiles affect liking.” Such focus does not provide the information necessary to synthesize affective behavior in long dynamic and real-time interactions. In consequence, theories do not play a large role in the development of artificial affective systems by engineers, but self-learning systems develop their behavior out of large corpora of recorded interactions. The status quo is characterized by measurement issues, theoretical lacunae regarding prevalence and functions of affective behavior in interaction, and underpowered studies that cannot provide the solid empirical foundation for further theoretical developments. This contribution will highlight some of these challenges and point towards next steps to create a rapprochement between engineers and affective scientists with a view to improving theory and solid applications.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nye_mentorstudio_2023,

title = {MentorStudio: Amplifying diverse voices through rapid, self-authorable virtual mentors},

author = {Benjamin D. Nye and Yuko Okado and Aaron Shiel and Kayla Carr and Milton Rosenberg and Enora Rice and Luke Ostrander and Megan Ju and Cassandra Gutierrez and Dilan Ramirez and Daniel Auerbach and Angelica Aguirre and William Swartout},

url = {https://zenodo.org/record/8226275},

doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.8226275},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-07-01},

urldate = {2024-01-11},

abstract = {Mentoring promotes underserved students' STEM persistence but it is difficult to scale up. Virtual agents can amplify mentors' experiences to larger audiences, which is particularly important for mentors from under-represented backgrounds and for underserved students with less access to mentors. This paper introduces MentorStudio, an online platform that allows real-life mentors to self-record and publish video-based conversational virtual agents. MentorStudio's goals are to increase speed, scheduling flexibility, and autonomy in creating intelligent virtual mentors. MentorStudio platform components are introduced, along with initial feedback regarding usability and acceptance collected from 20 STEM mentors who recorded virtual mentors. Overall, the MentorStudio platform has good ease-of-use and acceptance among mentors and offers a platform capable of recording large number of mentors to expand their reach to an unlimited number of students.},

note = {Publisher: Zenodo},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{rodrigues_multidimensional_2023,

title = {A multidimensional taxonomy for human-robot interaction in construction},

author = {Patrick B. Rodrigues and Rashmi Singh and Mert Oytun and Pooya Adami and Peter J. Woods and Burcin Becerik-Gerber and Lucio Soibelman and Yasemin Copur-Gencturk and Gale M. Lucas},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092658052300105X},

doi = {10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104845},

issn = {0926-5805},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-06-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {Automation in Construction},

volume = {150},

pages = {104845},

abstract = {Despite the increased interest in construction robotics both in academia and the industry, insufficient attention has been given to aspects related to Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Characterizing HRI for construction tasks can help researchers organize knowledge in a structured manner that allows for classifying construction robotics applications and comparing and benchmarking different studies. This paper builds upon existing taxonomies and empirical studies in HRI in various industries (e.g., construction, manufacturing, and military, among others) to propose a multidimensional taxonomy to characterize HRI applications in the construction industry. The taxonomy design followed a systematic literature review in which common themes were identified and grouped into 16 categories. The proposed taxonomy can be used as a foundation for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of HRI applications in construction and can benefit the construction industry by informing the design of collaborative tasks performed by human-robot teams.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{gurney_role_2023,

title = {The Role of Heuristics and Biases during Complex Choices with an AI Teammate},

author = {Nikolos Gurney and John H. Miller and David V. Pynadath},

url = {https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/25741},

doi = {10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25741},

issn = {2374-3468, 2159-5399},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-06-01},

urldate = {2023-12-08},

journal = {AAAI},

volume = {37},

number = {5},

pages = {5993–6001},

abstract = {Behavioral scientists have classically documented aversion to algorithmic decision aids, from simple linear models to AI. Sentiment, however, is changing and possibly accelerating AI helper usage. AI assistance is, arguably, most valuable when humans must make complex choices. We argue that classic experimental methods used to study heuristics and biases are insufficient for studying complex choices made with AI helpers. We adapted an experimental paradigm designed for studying complex choices in such contexts. We show that framing and anchoring effects impact how people work with an AI helper and are predictive of choice outcomes. The evidence suggests that some participants, particularly those in a loss frame, put too much faith in the AI helper and experienced worse choice outcomes by doing so. The paradigm also generates computational modeling-friendly data allowing future studies of human-AI decision making.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{gibson_does_2023,

title = {Does early detection of atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of thromboembolic events? Rationale and design of the Heartline study},

author = {C. Michael Gibson and Steven Steinhubl and Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy and Mintu P. Turakhia and Rod Passman and W. Schuyler Jones and T. Jared Bunch and Anne B. Curtis and Eric D. Peterson and Jeremy Ruskin and Leslie Saxon and Michael Tarino and Khaldoun G. Tarakji and Nassir Marrouche and Mithun Patel and Ante Harxhi and Simrati Kaul and Janeta Nikolovski and Stephanie Juan and Kevin Wildenhaus and C. V. Damaraju and John A. Spertus},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870323000145},

doi = {10.1016/j.ahj.2023.01.004},

issn = {0002-8703},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-05-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {American Heart Journal},

volume = {259},

pages = {30–41},

abstract = {Background 

The impact of using direct-to-consumer wearable devices as a means to timely detect atrial fibrillation (AF) and to improve clinical outcomes is unknown. 

Methods 

Heartline is a pragmatic, randomized, and decentralized application-based trial of US participants aged ≥65 years. Two randomized cohorts include adults with possession of an iPhone and without a history of AF and those with a diagnosis of AF taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for ≥30 days. Participants within each cohort are randomized (3:1) to either a core digital engagement program (CDEP) via iPhone application (Heartline application) and an Apple Watch (Apple Watch Group) or CDEP alone (iPhone-only Group). The Apple Watch Group has the watch irregular rhythm notification (IRN) feature enabled and access to the ECG application on the Apple Watch. If an IRN notification is issued for suspected AF then the study application instructs participants in the Apple Watch Group to seek medical care. All participants were “watch-naïve” at time of enrollment and have an option to either buy or loan an Apple Watch as part of this study. The primary end point is time from randomization to clinical diagnosis of AF, with confirmation by health care claims. Key secondary endpoint are claims-based incidence of a 6-component composite cardiovascular/systemic embolism/mortality event, DOAC medication use and adherence, costs/health resource utilization, and frequency of hospitalizations for bleeding. All study assessments, including patient-reported outcomes, are conducted through the study application. The target study enrollment is approximately 28,000 participants in total; at time of manuscript submission, a total of 26,485 participants have been enrolled into the study. 

Conclusion 

The Heartline Study will assess if an Apple Watch with the IRN and ECG application, along with application-facilitated digital health engagement modules, improves time to AF diagnosis and cardiovascular outcomes in a real-world environment. 

Trial registration 

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04276441.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{pal_comparing_2023,

title = {Comparing Statistical Models for Retrieval based Question-answering Dialogue: BERT vs Relevance Models},

author = {Debaditya Pal and Anton Leuski and David Traum},

url = {https://journals.flvc.org/FLAIRS/article/view/133386},

doi = {10.32473/flairs.36.133386},

issn = {2334-0762},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-05-01},

urldate = {2023-08-23},

journal = {FLAIRS},

volume = {36},

abstract = {In this paper, we compare the performance of four models in a retrieval based question answering dialogue task on two moderately sized corpora (textasciitilde 10,000 utterances). One model is a statistical model and uses cross language relevance while the others are deep neural networks utilizing the BERT architecture along with different retrieval methods. The statistical model has previously outperformed LSTM based neural networks in a similar task whereas BERT has been proven to perform well on a variety of NLP tasks, achieving state-of-the-art results in many of them. Results show that the statistical cross language relevance model outperforms the BERT based architectures in learning question-answer mappings. BERT achieves better results by mapping new questions to existing questions.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{chadalapaka_leveraging_2023,

title = {Leveraging Graph Networks to Model Environments in Reinforcement Learning},

author = {Viswanath Chadalapaka and Volkan Ustun and Lixing Liu},

url = {https://journals.flvc.org/FLAIRS/article/view/133118},

doi = {10.32473/flairs.36.133118},

issn = {2334-0762},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-05-01},

urldate = {2023-08-04},

journal = {FLAIRS},

volume = {36},

abstract = {This paper proposes leveraging graph neural networks (GNNs) to model an agent’s environment to construct superior policy networks in reinforcement learning (RL). To this end, we explore the effects of different combinations of GNNs and graph network pooling functions on policy performance. We also run experiments at different levels of problem complexity, which affect how easily we expect an agent to learn an optimal policy and therefore show whether or not graph networks are effective at various problem complexity levels. The efficacy of our approach is shown via experimentation in a partially-observable, non-stationary environment that parallels the highly-practical scenario of a military training exercise with human trainees, where the learning goal is to become the best sparring partner possible for human trainees. Our results present that our models can generate better-performing sparring partners by employing GNNs, as demonstrated by these experiments in the proof-of-concept environment. We also explore our model’s applicability in Multi-Agent RL scenarios. Our code is available online at https://github.com/Derposoft/GNNsAsEnvs.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{aris_learning_2023,

title = {Learning to Take Cover with Navigation-Based Waypoints via Reinforcement Learning},

author = {Timothy Aris and Volkan Ustun and Rajay Kumar},

url = {https://journals.flvc.org/FLAIRS/article/view/133348},

doi = {10.32473/flairs.36.133348},

issn = {2334-0762},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-05-01},

urldate = {2023-08-04},

journal = {FLAIRS},

volume = {36},

abstract = {This paper presents a reinforcement learning model designed to learn how to take cover on geo-specific terrains, an essential behavior component for military training simulations. Training of the models is performed on the Rapid Integration and Development Environment (RIDE) leveraging the Unity ML-Agents framework. This work expands on previous work on raycast-based agents by increasing the number of enemies from one to three. We demonstrate an automated way of generating training and testing data within geo-specific terrains. We show that replacing the action space with a more abstracted, navmesh-based waypoint movement system can increase the generality and success rate of the models while providing similar results to our previous paper's results regarding retraining across terrains. We also comprehensively evaluate the differences between these and the previous models. Finally, we show that incorporating pixels into the model's input can increase performance at the cost of longer training times.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{murawski_transforming_2023,

title = {Transforming a Negotiation Framework to Resolve Conflicts among Older Adults and Family Caregivers},

author = {Alaine Murawski and Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld and Allison Schierer and Charles Olvera and Johnathan Mell and Jonathan Gratch and Jeanne Brett and Lee A. Lindquist},

url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3417/8/2/36},

doi = {10.3390/geriatrics8020036},

issn = {2308-3417},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-04-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {Geriatrics},

volume = {8},

number = {2},

pages = {36},

abstract = {Background: Family caregivers of older people with Alzheimer’s dementia (PWD) often need to advocate and resolve health-related conflicts (e.g., determining treatment necessity, billing errors, and home health extensions). As they deal with these health system conflicts, family caregivers experience unnecessary frustration, anxiety, and stress. The goal of this research was to apply a negotiation framework to resolve real-world family caregiver–older adult conflicts. Methods: We convened an interdisciplinary team of national community-based family caregivers, social workers, geriatricians, and negotiation experts (n = 9; Illinois, Florida, New York, and California) to examine the applicability of negotiation and conflict management frameworks to three older adult–caregiver conflicts (i.e., caregiver–older adult, caregiver–provider, and caregiver–caregiver). The panel of caregivers provided scenarios and dialogue describing conflicts they experienced in these three settings. A qualitative analysis was then performed grouping the responses into a framework matrix. Results: Upon presenting the three conflicts to the caregivers, 96 responses (caregiver–senior), 75 responses (caregiver–caregiver), and 80 responses (caregiver–provider) were generated. A thematic analysis showed that the statements and responses fit the interest–rights–power (IRP) negotiation framework. Discussion: The interests–rights–power (IRP) framework, used in business negotiations, provided insight into how caregivers experienced conflict with older adults, providers, and other caregivers. Future research is needed to examine applying the IRP framework in the training of caregivers of older people with Alzheimer’s dementia.},

note = {Number: 2 

Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{liu_be_2023,

title = {Be prepared: How training and emergency type affect evacuation behaviour},

author = {Ruying Liu and Runhe Zhu and Burcin Becerik‐Gerber and Gale M. Lucas and Erroll G. Southers},

url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12812},

doi = {10.1111/jcal.12812},

issn = {0266-4909, 1365-2729},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-04-01},

urldate = {2023-08-22},

journal = {Computer Assisted Learning},

pages = {jcal.12812},

abstract = {Abstract 

 Background 

 Video‐based training has been widely adopted by private organizations and public authorities to educate occupants on various types of building emergencies. However, the effectiveness of video‐based training for preparing occupants for building emergencies has not been rigorously studied nor has the impact of emergency type been investigated on training effectiveness. 

 Objectives 

 This study examines whether video‐based training is an effective method to prepare occupants for building emergencies and how the effectiveness differs in the context of different building emergencies. 

 Methods 

 We simulated fire and active shooter emergencies in a virtual office building and conducted evacuation experiments to examine participants' emergency responses using both objective and subjective metrics. A total of 108 participants were recruited and responded to the fire or active shooter incident with or without video‐based training. 

 Results and Conclusions 

 The results revealed that participants with video‐based training more often chose to follow other recommendations when responding to building emergencies instead of simply following others. Results from ANOVA showed that training increased participants' self‐efficacy significantly, especially for those in the active shooter group. Moreover, participants in the active shooter simulation had a higher level of response efficacy than those in the fire emergency simulation. Our results also demonstrated the influence of emergency type on participants' final decisions and considerations of the recommendations. 

 Implications 

 Our results suggested that video‐based training is effective in improving participants' emergency preparedness and changing their behaviour patterns to a certain extent such as reducing following behaviour and encouraging safe evacuations. Additionally, statistically significant interactions between video‐based training and emergency types suggested that training effectiveness should be considered in accordance with the emergency type. 

 , 

 Lay Description 

 What is already known about this topic 

 People can behave differently in different types of building emergencies. Understanding human behaviours in building emergencies is essential for developing emergency preparedness strategies. 

 Emergency training is important for building occupants and video is a widely used media for emergency training. However, its training effectiveness needs to be evaluated. 

 What this paper adds 

 We used virtual environments to investigate evacuation behaviour. 

 The effectiveness of video‐based training and human responses in building emergencies were studied on both subjective responses and objective measurements. 

 Video‐based training significantly reduced the occurrence of following behaviours. 

 The different natures of the fire emergency and active shooter incidents shape the effectiveness of video‐based training. 

 Implications of study findings for practitioners 

 Video‐based training can improve building occupants' emergency preparedness to a certain extent. 

 Emergency training media should be designed considering the influence of emergency type.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{gratch_promise_2023,

title = {The promise and peril of interactive embodied agents for studying non-verbal communication: a machine learning perspective},

author = {Jonathan Gratch},

url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rstb.2021.0475},

doi = {10.1098/rstb.2021.0475},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-03-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences},

volume = {378},

number = {1875},

pages = {20210475},

abstract = {In face-to-face interactions, parties rapidly react and adapt to each other's words, movements and expressions. Any science of face-to-face interaction must develop approaches to hypothesize and rigorously test mechanisms that explain such interdependent behaviour. Yet conventional experimental designs often sacrifice interactivity to establish experimental control. Interactive virtual and robotic agents have been offered as a way to study true interactivity while enforcing a measure of experimental control by allowing participants to interact with realistic but carefully controlled partners. But as researchers increasingly turn to machine learning to add realism to such agents, they may unintentionally distort the very interactivity they seek to illuminate, particularly when investigating the role of non-verbal signals such as emotion or active-listening behaviours. Here I discuss some of the methodological challenges that may arise when machine learning is used to model the behaviour of interaction partners. By articulating and explicitly considering these commitments, researchers can transform ‘unintentional distortions’ into valuable methodological tools that yield new insights and better contextualize existing experimental findings that rely on learning technology. 

This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Face2face: advancing the science of social interaction’.},

note = {Publisher: Royal Society},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{pynadath_disaster_2023,

title = {Disaster world},

author = {David V. Pynadath and Bistra Dilkina and David C. Jeong and Richard S. John and Stacy C. Marsella and Chirag Merchant and Lynn C. Miller and Stephen J. Read},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-022-09359-y},

doi = {10.1007/s10588-022-09359-y},

issn = {1572-9346},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-03-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {Comput Math Organ Theory},

volume = {29},

number = {1},

pages = {84–117},

abstract = {Artificial intelligence (AI) research provides a rich source of modeling languages capable of generating socially plausible simulations of human behavior, while also providing a transparent ground truth that can support validation of social-science methods applied to that simulation. In this work, we leverage two established AI representations: decision-theoretic planning and recursive modeling. Decision-theoretic planning (specifically Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes) provides agents with quantitative models of their corresponding real-world entities’ subjective (and possibly incorrect) perspectives of ground truth in the form of probabilistic beliefs and utility functions. Recursive modeling gives an agent a theory of mind, which is necessary when a person’s (again, possibly incorrect) subjective perspectives are of another person, rather than of just his/her environment. We used PsychSim, a multiagent social-simulation framework combining these two AI frameworks, to build a general parameterized model of human behavior during disaster response, grounding the model in social-psychological theories to ensure social plausibility. We then instantiated that model into alternate ground truths for simulating population response to a series of natural disasters, namely, hurricanes. The simulations generate data in response to socially plausible instruments (e.g., surveys) that serve as input to the Ground Truth program’s designated research teams for them to conduct simulated social science. The simulation also provides a graphical ground truth and a set of outcomes to be used as the gold standard in evaluating the research teams’ inferences.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{hsu_virtual_2023,

title = {A virtual reality program to assess cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study},

author = {Wan-Yu Hsu and Joaquin A. Anguera and Albert Rizzo and Richard Campusano and Nancy D. Chiaravalloti and John DeLuca and Adam Gazzaley and Riley M. Bove},

url = {https://www.proquest.com/docview/2787027204/abstract/BEA88F7BB72B4623PQ/1},

doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2023.1139316},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-03-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},

abstract = {Introduction: Cognitive impairment is a debilitating symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Most of the neuropsychological tasks have little resemblance to everyday life. There is a need for ecologically valid tools for assessing cognition in real-life functional contexts in MS. One potential solution would involve the use of virtual reality (VR) to exert finer control over the task presentation environment; however, VR studies in the MS population are scarce. Objectives: To explore the utility and feasibility of a VR program for cognitive assessment in MS. Methods: A VR classroom embedded with a continuous performance task (CPT) was assessed in 10 non-MS adults and 10 people with MS with low cognitive functioning. Participants performed the CPT with distractors (ie. WD) and without distractors (ie. ND). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), California Verbal Learning Test – II (CVLT-II), and a feedback survey on the VR program were administered. Results: People with MS exhibited greater reaction time variability (RTV) compared to non-MS participants, and greater RTV in both WD and ND conditions was associated with lower SDMT. Conclusions: VR tools warrant further research to determine their value as an ecologically valid platform for assessing cognition and everyday functioning in people with MS.},

note = {Place: Lausanne, Switzerland 

Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation 

Section: ORIGINAL RESEARCH article},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{awada_ten_2023,

title = {Ten questions concerning the impact of environmental stress on office workers},

author = {Mohamad Awada and Burcin Becerik-Gerber and Ruying Liu and Mirmahdi Seyedrezaei and Zheng Lu and Matheos Xenakis and Gale Lucas and Shawn C. Roll and Shrikanth Narayanan},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132322011945},

doi = {10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109964},

issn = {0360-1323},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-02-01},

urldate = {2023-03-31},

journal = {Building and Environment},

volume = {229},

pages = {109964},

abstract = {We regularly face stress during our everyday activities, to the extent that stress is recognized by the World Health Organization as the epidemic of the 21st century. Stress is how humans respond physically and psychologically to adjustments, experiences, conditions, and circumstances in their lives. While there are many reasons for stress, work and job pressure remain the main cause. Thus, companies are increasingly interested in creating healthier, more comfortable, and stress-free offices for their workers. The indoor environment can induce environmental stress when it cannot satisfy the individual needs for health and comfort. In fact, office environmental conditions (e.g., thermal, and indoor air conditions, lighting, and noise) and interior design parameters (e.g., office layout, colors, furniture, access to views, distance to window, personal control and biophilic design) have been found to affect office workers' stress levels. A line of research based on the stress recovery theory offers new insights for establishing offices that limit environmental stress and help with work stress recovery. To that end, this paper answers ten questions that explore the relation between the indoor office-built environment and stress levels among workers. The answers to the ten questions are based on an extensive literature review to draw conclusions from what has been achieved to date. Thus, this study presents a foundation for future environmental stress related research in offices.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}